Bug report #5844
When adding a gpx the dialog shows "Nb of features" all set to "-1"
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Assignee: | - | ||
| Category: | Data Provider | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | master | Regression?: | No |
| Operating System: | Easy fix?: | No | |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | wontfix |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | No | Copied to github as #: | 15314 |
Description
It used to show the right number of features, I'm almost sure it is a regression (I'm testing on master). I will give a try to 1.8 and 1.7.4
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Alexander Bruy over 12 years ago
This caused by fix for #5322 (ODBC and GPX both uses OGR provider)
#2
Updated by Alexander Bruy over 12 years ago
Starting from b6ad69d12c the "unknown" showed instead of "-1". I know this is not real fix, but at least this less confusing
#3
Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 12 years ago
- Priority changed from High to Severe/Regression
tagging as blocker as it is a regression.
#4
Updated by Jürgen Fischer almost 12 years ago
- Priority changed from Severe/Regression to Normal
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
tagging as blocker as it is a regression.
I don't agree it's a regression. IMHO it's an improvement and not a bug (see #5322). The output isn't required and therefore should be a blocker.
#5
Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 12 years ago
Jürgen Fischer wrote:
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
tagging as blocker as it is a regression.
I don't agree it's a regression. IMHO it's an improvement and not a bug (see #5322). The output isn't required and therefore should be a blocker.
From a user point of view is certainly a regression, because something that says "-1" is not as informative as something (as before) that says (ex.) "35".
But if you say that is not a regression, that as I said is not true, then we should a) close this ticket or b) at least remove that column that says 'feature count "-1"'.
#6
Updated by Jürgen Fischer almost 12 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- Resolution set to fixed
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
But if you say that is not a regression, that as I said is not true, then we should a) close this ticket or b) at least remove that column that says 'feature count "-1"'.
Alex already made it say "Unknown" instead of "-1".
#7
Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 12 years ago
- Resolution changed from fixed to wontfix
Alex already made it say "Unknown" instead of "-1".
it doesn't change the meaning of what I said, from a user point of view is a regression.