Bug report #467
some colored GRASS rasters appear greyscale in QGIS
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | ||
| Assignee: |  Redmine Admin | ||
| Category: | GRASS | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | Regression?: | No | |
| Operating System: | All | Easy fix?: | No |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | Resolution: | invalid | |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | Copied to github as #: | 10526 |
Description
GRASS set a default color table at the new rasters, in the case of rasters created by some modules (like r.cost, r.drain....) the raster appears colored in GRASS but if I load it in QGIS it appears greyscale colored. Only if I set the color table by r.colors or by QGIS-GRASS module I see the same colors visualization in GRASS and QGIS.
History
#1
Updated by anonymous - almost 18 years ago
I thing that those modules do not set a default table but they just dont set any table but I have to check it. If there is no CT then any application can visualize in different way. Greyscale seems to be more appropriate for a raster without CT IMO.
Radim
#2
Updated by anonymous - almost 18 years ago
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Yes r.cost does not create CT so any application is free how to visualize it. I think that greyscale is better then colored because colors can make an impression that a CT is defined.
If you think that it should realy use the same colors like GRASS then please fill a new 'enhancement' ticket for 0.9.
Radim
#3 Updated by Anonymous about 15 years ago
Milestone Version 0.8 deleted