Bug report #20114

[processing] no cell size option for IDW interpolation alg

Added by Saber Razmjooei about 6 years ago. Updated almost 6 years ago.

Status:Closed
Priority:Normal
Assignee:-
Category:Processing/QGIS
Affected QGIS version:3.3(master) Regression?:No
Operating System: Easy fix?:No
Pull Request or Patch supplied:No Resolution:fixed/implemented
Crashes QGIS or corrupts data:No Copied to github as #:27936

Description

Not sure if it is a feature request or a bug!

In QGIS 2.18 interpolation plugin, user can set either the cell size or no. columns/rows. But in master, the IDW Interpolation which is the closest to the plugin lacks cell size option.


Related issues

Related to QGIS Application - Bug report #19701: "cell size" option in TIN interpolation tool is missing Closed 2018-08-26

Associated revisions

Revision 84d155ea
Added by Alexander Bruy almost 6 years ago

Merge pull request #8759 from alexbruy/processing-interpolation

[processing][needs-docs] Add cell size parameter to native interpolation algorithms (fix #18556, #20114)

Revision 19d8605c
Added by Alexander Bruy almost 6 years ago

Merge pull request #8770 from alexbruy/processing-backports

[processing] Add cell size parameter to native interpolation algorithms (fix #18556, #20114)

History

#1 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Feedback

"Duplicate" of #19701 ?
Both tools are almost unusable without a parameter for output resolution (pixel size).

#2 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 6 years ago

  • Related to Bug report #19701: "cell size" option in TIN interpolation tool is missing added

#3 Updated by Saber Razmjooei about 6 years ago

Hi Gio, they are two different algs. But I agree they are similar issues. As long as there is a note for devs not to forget this tool, happy to mark it duplicate and hence closing.

#4 Updated by Giovanni Manghi about 6 years ago

Saber Razmjooei wrote:

Hi Gio, they are two different algs. But I agree they are similar issues. As long as there is a note for devs not to forget this tool, happy to mark it duplicate and hence closing.

that is why I wrote "duplicate" in between quotes ;)

#5 Updated by Alexander Bruy almost 6 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed

#6 Updated by Alexander Bruy almost 6 years ago

  • Resolution set to fixed/implemented

Also available in: Atom PDF