Feature request #17349
Sort out the trusted/untrusted plugins/authors stuff
Status: | Closed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | ||
Assignee: | Borys Jurgiel | ||
Category: | Plugin Manager | ||
Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | fixed/implemented |
Easy fix?: | No | Copied to github as #: | 25246 |
Description
Let's gather existing discussions.
Richard said:
Instead of this black-white labeling I now have the idea that we should maybe move to some 'crowd testing': that is we ask everybody to 'test' have a look at new plugins, and not earlier then such a plugin 'earns' enough 'works for me and did not harm me' points it will get a flag 'the crowd thinks this one is ok'...
Not only then we share the responsibility to tell if a plugin is ok/helpful/harmful or not, but we can also make plugin builders to try to 'market' their plugins by asking on lists to test his/her plugin...
ML topic:
Previous issue: #14914 (now depreciated)
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by Borys Jurgiel about 7 years ago
- Related to Feature request #14914: Add a warning to Plugin manager added
#2 Updated by Jürgen Fischer about 7 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#3 Updated by Borys Jurgiel about 6 years ago
- Resolution set to fixed/implemented
- Status changed from Open to Closed
I guess we can assume it's sorted out.