Bug report #10715
Error in MetaSearch browsing search results
| Status: | Closed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Assignee: |  Tom Kralidis | ||
| Category: | MetaSearch Catalogue Client | ||
| Affected QGIS version: | 2.2.0 | Regression?: | No |
| Operating System: | Easy fix?: | No | |
| Pull Request or Patch supplied: | No | Resolution: | up/downstream |
| Crashes QGIS or corrupts data: | No | Copied to github as #: | 19105 |
Description
Adding the Italian CSW (http://www.rndt.gov.it/RNDT/CSW) to MetaSearch, and searching
for a common keyword ('province'), I get > 10 records. Only 5 are displayed, even if the dialog
reports "1-10 of 21 shown". If I click on the Next arrow, I get an error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/qgis/python/plugins/MetaSearch/dialogs/maindialog.py", line 644,
in navigate
startposition=self.startfrom, esn='full')
File "/usr/share/qgis/python/owslib/csw.py", line 348, in getrecords2
self.results['matches'] = int(util.testXMLValue(val, True))
TypeError: int() argument must be a string or a number, not 'NoneType'
In the Log Console (tab 'Python warning') I had a warning:
... csw.py:356:UserWarning: CSW Server did not supply a nextRecord value
(it is optional), so the client should page througt the results in
another way.""
History
#1
Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 10 years ago
- Assignee set to Tom Kralidis
#2
Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 10 years ago
- Category changed from Python plugins to MetaSearch Catalogue Client
#3
Updated by Tom Kralidis over 10 years ago
- Resolution set to up/downstream
FYI the CSW server / metadata provider is returning results sets with duplicate identifiers. Since the underlying CSW client in MetaSearch (OWSLib) is storing these as a dictionary, the duplicates are causing overwriting of records (hence 10 records become 5). Trace based on searching for 'province':
{'matches': 21, 'nextrecord': 11, 'returned': 10}
r_campan:16050011:20090527:104104
r_campan:16050011:20090527:104104
r_molise:{4E01E5F5-AA5E-4EA0-BEB6-D8CC49EEB129}
r_molise:{4E01E5F5-AA5E-4EA0-BEB6-D8CC49EEB129}
r_molise:{1743F3AC-265B-4BC3-BB76-A49C7B1857B3}
r_molise:{1743F3AC-265B-4BC3-BB76-A49C7B1857B3}
r_molise:{AB9E3733-C34E-40E8-ACB8-89DD2424BA2A}
r_molise:{AB9E3733-C34E-40E8-ACB8-89DD2424BA2A}
r_molise:{A22E2507-ECB0-4B0D-8D09-91237B2B0EFB}
r_molise:{A22E2507-ECB0-4B0D-8D09-91237B2B0EFB}
The CSW provider needs to update their records.
#4
Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 10 years ago
Thanks for the analysis. I'm forwarding it to RNDT peolpe.
Should we close this now?
#5
Updated by Tom Kralidis over 10 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
#6
Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 10 years ago
They are now aware of the problem, going to fix it.
Thanks.